Your WRONG!!!!!!!!!!! Totally wrong!!!
He was paid to use them as a resource tool to aid tracking and catching offenders.
I'd suggest they are better able to do this when alive.
Of course their welfare partly comes down to him but this is shared
They were in his 'care' at the time, according to all parties.
there are regulations about placing them in
There's laws about animal cruelty, too.
'protocol' more than likely prevented this.
See my earlier post where I suggested 'procedural error' would come into this debate.
Now, was he to ignore a lawfull order and NOT attend his meeting?
Or allegedly break the law by killing the dogs by neglect? btw- According to Murt's 'rumours' he was off-duty; this doesn't stack up with attending a mmeeting, surely?
risking a discipline procedure?
I'd suggest that he's risking such a procedure at the moment, unless the OP's suggestion of a cover-up takes place.
keeping within guidlines but with tragic circumstances that many of us would not suspect could occur in such a short time let alone their handler..?
"Tragic error"......."nobody could have known"...... Try "nobody knew it was that hot that day". Say it was for the handler's safety, or terrorism related
I would like to think it was a massive error of judgement and not neglect.
I'd say it's both, so we half agree.
RH , i would like to know WHY you are so negative over the Police forces in this country
I'm not anti-police, just anti BAD police. I hope you can appreciate that there is a difference. If you can't see a difference then it would reflect worse on you than on me; if you can, then we might find common ground.
it seems to be the only time you rear your head..
Apart from (eg) V-power & supercharger comments to Karlos?
Must be difficult being so perfect :bow:
Personal abuse - the resort of a man running out of debating strategy?
I have a question- why do you and others insist on defending this clown & his ilk?
RH
