rovinghawk
Registered User
I'm pleased to hear it. What does a 'response officer' do, then?I doubt very much that he is, as yet, in a public facing role.
I totally accept that.you may not agree with the punishment handed down but that's why we have judges.
But nobody in the force will be held accountable for their mistakes. That was the point I was trying to make.the force acknowedged and accepeted some of the responsibility.
If that's the case then I'm pleased he's aware of his guilt.I imagine that there is no-one that feels as bad about this as he does.
My apologies for the misunderstanding- it's not gloating in the slightest- it's annoyance that a load of excuses get trotted out about being a victim rather than a perpetrator..what I object to is the quite horrible gloating tone that came out in your post
I'm actually pro-police; I'm anti BAD police. To be fair, I'm also anti criminal & anti bad civil service.this particular anti-police soap
RH
Last edited: