-
Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )
Playing pinball with cyclists
- Thread starter Cougar377
- Start date
Overnight recess.Its called "zap a judge"
I strongly urge you to take legal advice before we reconvene tomorrow.
And bring your cheque book.
Hmm, tomorrows headlines “Self appointed (pro cyclist) Judge in the cyclist is a twat case openly calls for a bribe”
Can't fault the case you put forward.
Twatometer Pro. Superb software.
The Pro version even has an option to post the photos to your social media accounts with a suitably scathing comment.
All you have to do is name the miscreant (Gimp in lycra, in this case) and it does the rest.
Today might well be the day that your case is destroyed.
If not, it may be tomorrow if I can’t be arsed today.
Either way, it’s happening.
You've been overruled by the forum's jury, Judge Judy.
Difference being my case is based on the evidence that you have presented which is, frankly, laughable and about to be dismantled.
It is not too late to seek an out of court settlement and I would strongly urge that you consider this, not least to avoid significant public humiliation.
The facts are very simple.... a cyclist attempted to ram his way through a group of pedestrians.
He had no room to do so and he made no effort to mitigate the risk to those more vulnerable than himself by slowing down.
All joking aside.... had that been a child, elderly person or pram (all of which are regularly seen on the trail) then he could have injured someone.
As it was, all I suffered was a bit of aching in the shoulder for a day or two. I sincerely hope he suffered worse.
…..digging the hole even deeper……….
Panicky rhetoric is no defence against facts. Especially when you have made statements of fact.
Fact.
Yes dear. Keep taking the tablets.
Is that a pn opening gambit for claiming ‘diminished responsibility’ as a defence?
The only thing that diminished was the prat on the racer as he exited stage left.
And he showed no responsibility.
Don't give a shit about him. Are your sunglasses OK?
Keep digging….
When are you putting this in front of us jurors then? I can't wait.
As foreman of the jury I have reviewed all evidence & find the cyclist guilty of all offences in this case, we the jury also find the cyclist guilty of fly tipping, abandoning a bike in a secluded place, being indecently attired, not displaying lights, not sounding a warning of his impending stupidity, frightening wildlife & generally being a twat.
Seems fair, but wait to hear what Inspector Clouseau has to say....