• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

WHY AREN'T THERE ANY.....

Stevebrooke

Knee up, wheel down
Club Sponsor
.......DIESEL MOTORBIKES? :dunno:

I know there are probably an odd one or two out there, but I was thinking more along the lines of mass-production.

One or two sensible answers would be appreciated before all the p1ss takers move in :}
 

Nick Brett

Registered User
Who the hell would want a bike thats,.... slow, noisy, heavy, and vibrates like a bastid. Ahh yes Pikey hit the nail on the head. :yo:
 

birdinflight

Registered User
I believe that there are diesel motorbikes...........

If I am right in thinking within the military???? Someone will come along and answer this better than me.
 
R

roXXo

Guest
There are numerous diesel engined motorcycles available but the diesel engine is so heavy because of it's construction for high compression, compression ignition. The type of power produced is unsuitable for motorcycles. There is a lot of torque at low revs and generally diesels prefer to be run at constant revs. Most deisel engined bikes are single cyclinder but there are a couple of italian twin cylinder diesel engines that have been put into motorcycle frames.
Motorycycles should be light and quick.
The diesel engined bikes are have none of these qualities. I believe the Americans have developed a Kawasaki KLR with a dieslel engine which may meet some military specified duties but not those of general motorcyling.
It makes more sense for the military (single fuel use, or dual with JP1) but not for the rest of us.
 
M

mikew

Guest
oh ha ha, nice thread. NOT!

I'm not the only one on this forum who tried diesel OK!!!!













darncottonpickinmuvhafeckinbastidswillneverletusforgetasimplelicklemistakegrrrrrr :mad:
 
M

mikew

Guest
surprisingly....

that's why I said I'm NOT the only one ...... :rolleyes:






just couldn't remember who it was .........
 
T

trophychap

Guest
and someone else (not a million miles away from where I'm sitting!) also put a few litres of diesel in his bike whilst in France this year! Like Rob he couldn't quite grasp at first what he had done and what the smell was, or why the nozzle was black ....

Anyway he then filled it up with petrol, we said a prayer and carried on. Quite a few tanksful later, there seem to be no effects, adverse or otherwise (there were none at the time either as it happens) so thank the Lord for that!

So don't worry Mike, Rob and anyone else who's had that sinking feeling - you're not on your own!

Jenny

PS I filled a diesel Fiesta up with unleaded once; so I couldn't criticise anyone for doing it, it's too bloody easy!
 
R

R2B2

Guest
derek kelly said:
What about Rob p xx ? he had a diesel blackbird didn't he?

Indeed I did, briefly, last Saturday. But we wont go into that!

This is a bit long winded, but bloody interesting on the theme of diesels. (most of it is from RIDE magazine, back in 2002. I've just dug it out and re-read the article. The diesel bike question is more relevant than most people think. Here goes.....

There is a lot of R & D going on into smaller capacity, higher output diesel engines among the car engine manufacturers. This is because emission laws will get tougher, and diesel engines have the potential to run cleaner than petrol engines because of the way the fuel is burnt in the combustion chamber. As it stands already, much more of the petrol injected into an engine goes unburnt compared to that of a diesel, and that makes the petrol engine more of an emissions issue than the diesel.

Diesel engine technology is moving forward much quicker than the petrols, and it's all about torque. The BMW 330d engine produces more torque than the Ferrari 360 Modena. And Lotus are well involved in the development of a 1.2 litre diesel Elise that can already out accelerate a Porche 911 on 0-60. The bike manufacturers are watching closely for the car engine manufacturers to develop the small capacity diesel engine technology.

Why?

Because there's a shock in store for the bike makers in 2006 - "Euro 3". The Euro 3 emissions test will be far more stringent than at present and is going to bring problems for the big sportsbikes. For the first time bikes will have to compete on equal terms with cars re emissions.

Paul Etheridge is manager of the motorcycle group at Ricardo, one of the worlds foremost automotive technology providers and a company hugely instrumental in the development of the latest generation direct injection high speed diesel engines. Say's he "bikes have had it easy up 'til now. The emissions tests were carried out at no more than 50 kph, on fully warmed up engines. Euro 3 demands far higher speeds and loads - up to 120 kph - from a cold start. It gets worse. The engines will have to pass the same tests when it's 30,000 kms old, before the bike will get type approval. Getting petrol engines to return the kind of efficiency to pass those tests is going to be a Herculean task. To put it into perspective, were talking about R1's going from 150 bhp back down to 100 bhp". With ultra-high top-end power engines under threat, super-torquey, super-efficient diesel engines look more attractive.

The venture Roxxo mentioned is partly British, Hayes Diversified Technologies (HDT) are the brains from the Royal Military College of Science. They supply the modded Kawasaki KLR engine to the American Military (dubbed the JP8), a bike-specific diesel engine which is only 1 ft-lb of torque behind the original petrol motor.

David Blundell of Lotus Engineering says "The easier ride afforded by the big bang engines and large capacity four strokes is well established in MotoGP. The relatively flat torque curve of a diesel would offer the same advantages. And as the technological demands of smaller and smaller car diesel engines coincide more and more with the needs of potential bike engines, so things become much more exciting"

Ricardo predicts that in the next few years, automotive engines will get as good as they can get as far as emissions testing goes. That means the attention of the legislators will turn from the traditional emissions measures of testing for Carbon Monoxide, Hydro-Carbons and Nitric oxides, and instead will turn towards Carbon Dioxide - and that means reducing overall fuel consumption. Diesels are already most of the way there, but the rest must come from downsizing... making smaller engines more powerful.

That's why behind closed doors manufacturers the world over are working like mad to come up with the trickest sub 1.5 ltr turbo diesel engines they can - the sort of thing that would fit nicely into a bike frame. With variable vane turbo technology about to overcome the blight of turbo lag, it all becomes more obvious the way things are likely to go.
 
S

skippy

Guest
Interesting article Rob but they are still flogging the same tired old hydrocarbon dead horse, fossil fueled vehicles dont need to be made more efficiant they need to be eliminated altogether.

Hydrogen is the only long term way forward g0551p
 
A

Aidey

Guest
I love diesel...... in a car. I went to the Alps a couple of weeks ago, and averaged 62mpg down there and back. Slowish. Not a problem to me, as cars are just practical transport, and I do 40000 a year in one. Bikes are for fun! Also went over to Italy for a day, to Aosta, over the St Bernard pass. Fantastic! Bloody cold too! Stayed in a villa in Les Allues, near Meribel, ?250 for a week. Bloody good value, although the price gets silly in the skiing season. Back to the point, diesel bikes, yes they do exist, but who wants a two wheeled Austin Maestro?
 
R

R2B2

Guest
trophychap said:
so I couldn't criticise anyone for doing it, it's too bloody easy!


I was surprised (and felt a tiny tad better) when they told me in the services that they usually get AT LEAST one fuel cock-up EVERY DAY. They said that the day before me a chap put ?260 :eek: of petrol in his diesel truck. Now that must've hurt!!
 
R

roXXo

Guest
Good info Rob

As technology advances some problems are sometimes solved. Diesel engines for bikes still have one big disadvantage at present and that is weight.
 
T

tailgator

Guest
There are a few deisel bikes around - mainly used by the armies so that they don't have to carry around different types of fuel. While there probably aren't too many 'sportsbikes' around with deisels there are plenty of 'dirt' bikes. I'll post a link when I find it!!
 
R

R2B2

Guest
roXXo said:
Diesel engines for bikes still have one big disadvantage at present and that is weight.

Yes - hence the quest to develop smaller capacity, higer output diesels. It's quite sneaky what the bike makers are doing in waiting for the car makers to do all the R & D!!

With diesel containing 12% more energy than petrol (summat I forgot to mention last night), and easier to meet emissions, then there is a good incentive to develop it.

Next couple of years should see some changes, especially as Euro 3 get closer!
 
Top