You [Timbo] is a BBC2 reject - so shouldn't be here anyway .....Him [Dark Angel, DA, Ducks Arse or whatever] left last week along with his Cares and Woes suitably packed and should have pissed off with that coont C. A. Veat
Hmm…
I see we’ve run out of arguments and turned to abusive posts, as expected. (My mate Veat was extremely upset, because he thought I was the
only person in the world who thinks he’s coont – but that’s another story!) No mention of the
Very
Famously
Recalled
1200 miles-n-it’s-fooked Honda, then, Bertie? :dunno:
Hopefully, you’ve realised that the bike isn’t what it
claims to be – a Sports Tourer – because it
can’t fulfil the role assumed by bikes that were introduced as
Sports bikes, but which became re-classified, first, as Hyperbikes and, ultimately, as Sports Tourers.
Generically speaking, they were long-range, continent-devouring speedsters, capable of carrying two people, plus luggage,
smoothly,
comfortably,
reliably and
economically to their chosen destination. Doesn’t sound anything
like a VFR1200, does it? Maybe that's why Honda :wank: are trying (now) to call the VFR a "Sports Road Machine", or summat.
So why are you both still posting on this thread? What are you after? Discounted Pakistani Leather Sofa's?
Steady now – stead-ee! At least you're getting better - now don't spoil it - remember the "
bad old days"...
...we don't want to revisit
those times, now do we?
We were merely discussing the merits, or lack thereof, of the new VFR1200 and, consequently, the consensus appears to be that the bike is a bag-o-shite. As you seem to have withdrawn from said discussion, one may only assume that you have, in your own inimitable style, conceded the point.
...Well done, me owd china... well done!!