Artemis said:
It wasn't called the Widowmaker for nothing Mike. Anyway, that's not an aeroplane, it's a rocket with stubs on the side.
It was only the European countries that had problems with the F104, hence the widowmaker handle. The Japanese Self Defence Air Force (as was) never lost a single one, cos they used them as they were supposed to be used.
We had a squadron exchange with a german Starfighter outfit, and this thing landed with so many extra external stores added to it, it was ungainly when taxiing in, and then the germans used the things as a ground attack weapon ... FFS it was designed as a high speed, high altitude interceptor, so consequently everything was pared down to the bone, so when it was used outside of it's original designed criteria, it became a bit of a liability. All the flying control PFCU were designed to operate in thin air conditions found at high altitude, not 50 feet off the deck with dozens of extras weapons bolted to the thing.
IMHO the Widowmaker handle is undeserved and had the aircraft been used as intended, then it wouldn't have earnt this name.