Lol!........ A perfect assessment of the propaganda sites!
For heavens sake Nitehawk, you really need to get yer head out of the sand for a short while and take a look back at what these threads have revealed. Just about all the major points of 'evidence' proffered by your propaganda sources have, under scrutiny, proved to have much more plausible, logical and common sense alternative explanations.
What is there left?? Speculation that some unknown Spanish Professor didn't have his Uni's approval to publish his accreditations. D & D has explained a couple of times that nothing can be mounted on the aircraft at those points. oh - and a new one about Guliani's records......... Ahhh, the conspiracy must be true then!!
That really is getting desperate. (Where did you read about Guiliani's records being vaulted? I'd be interested to read about that).
Oh, and the video's..... didn't you read in the post by DD that they are the subject of evidence in the prosecution of Malawi (sp?), and therefore cannot be released. Do you honestly still believe that those video's will show something other than a 757??
Face it - these sites have not only been selective (we know how they work now, you yourself have confirmed that they are economical and biased), but have now been proved to downright lie about things!! Why??
Yet still you hang on to the the most desperate and flimsiest of hopes that somehow all of this is going to miraculously swing the other way and that most if the world has got it all wrong! Why do you suppose you were so ridiculed and lambasted when you tried to take this to the American Forum? :dunno:
How would you account for the observations of the freight plane pilot who observed the airliner crashing into the WTC? (ftrom the aviation forum). He had somebody he knew on that plane - is he upholding the conspiracy? (As an example of just one individual of the thousands needed to pull off this cover-up).
What about the WTC emloyee unwittingly describing how the dust got into the lower lobby? Why does that count for nothing and yet the conspiracy site explanation of 'proof' that it was high explosives must be accepted by all?
It's obvious enough to me from some of the things you've said on these threads that it is your burning hatred of the yank administration that is now driving your unmovable faith in these theories, and not the content of the conspiracy sites...... accept it - the claims of these sites have now been exposed for what they really are. Seriously, how can anybody now trust anything perpetrated by these shocking sites?
Where?? Where is the valid stuff?? You keep talking about it but we never see it!! What else is REALLY left that has ANY credibility at all?? :dunno: