It's fine to have an opinion. However, when that opinion discriminates against others for what they are - not what they 'choose to be' - then it is best kept to oneself.
everyone has different tolerance levels and everyone has in-built discrimination in one form or another, whether it is conscious or unconscious.
To use the LGBT theme in this thread - plenty see it as a 'choice' and dare I say it even 'an illness'. Fortunately the vast majority accept it as being something natural, and that tolerance is increasing with each generation. Many feel uncomfortable with it and maybe that's fair enough as human nature is that we shy away from what isn't familiar and maybe what we don't understand.
The great way of putting LGBT into perspective is 'how would you react if your son/daughter 'came out''? Yes there are some who would be horrified and throw them out but most would get over it and continue to love and support their child.
I used to get really hacked off - even slightly offended- when I had to go through the tortuous process of doing a 'diversity check' when I had completed the annual pay and bonuses round at work. But, sadly, I could understand why it was necessary.
Derek, you are twisting this and you know it.Paedophiles are attracted to children, would you keep your opinions on those to yourself?
What people do behind closed doors is their business but please do not try to tell me that homosexuality is natural .
All the pc babble you have used is typical of the brainwashed indoctrinate pushed out by public service managers throughout the Country.
How can it be right that someone who has studied & worked hard gets overlooked in favour of a less qualified but gay person?
The World has gone crazy.
How am I twisting it? I only gave you an instance of where an opinion against somebody for what they are & not what they choose to be is acceptable.Derek, you are twisting this and you know it.
I think my measured response is...'whatever'.
The subject is LGBT Derek.How am I twisting it? I only gave you an instance of where an opinion against somebody for what they are & not what they choose to be is acceptable.
The organisation's arse needs kicking.A few years ago I challenged a decision made by one of my managers when a job was offered to a gay man over a straight one. I was on the interview panel & (mistakenly) assumed that, in accordance with my employers policy if two candidates came out with the same score, had the same experience & skills, i.e. there was no way to distinguish which of the two was the better candidate, then the LGBT, candidate was to be offered the job as minority groups were less represented. This went for all minority groups in what was then called positive discrimination.
Not a bit of it. the Gay candidate was given the job, even though he wasn't the best candidate because he was and I quote 'more likely to make an issue of his status if he didn't get the job'.
I'm all for equality but can cite numerous examples of where members of minority groups have used this to their advantage within my organisation, and each time management have back down as they didn't want to be seen as discriminatory.
And, having been the subject of a grievance complaint more than once, I now feel it's no longer my place to voice such opinions. I'm all for fair & reasonable in the way I interact with people but some people take the piss. It's this I object to.
I think the word 'biker' is the issue you have.As a white, retired, married (40 years last month), heterosexual, biker I’m increasingly feeling like a ethnic minority - and I don’t think anybody gives a toss about our feelings any more
The organisation's arse needs kicking.
But it used to be, will you accept paedophilia if it becomes legal?The subject is LGBT Derek.
LGBT is not illegal.