• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

You'll Hate this Feck me..

Pow-Lo

Make civil the mind, make savage the body.
Club Sponsor
It’s also not gone unnoticed that The Sun have slightly changed the story as they seem To have got themselves in a bit of a mess regarding what they said about Edwards. That’s the same Sun that persuaded Sam Fox to leave school,as a sixteen year old to be their lead page 3 girl.

And I see today that Dele Alli has been forced to break cover over his personal issues as the red toos have got wind and are contacting people in his world to get the story first.

They really are despicable. The ‘lessons learned’ and public remorse over their treatment of Diana is soon forgotten.
They're absolute scum, the lot of them.

Spitting Image had it bang on when they portrayed all press reporters as pigs.
 

Squag1

Can't remember....
Club Sponsor
Again, be careful. The 'young person' (why can't they just say it's a boy, FFS) involved was allegedly 17 at the material time. He's also stated that his mother's version of events is untrue.

It's all horseshit and the only people that know the truth are the two involved. Personally, I'm staying well clear.
Stick with the sheep:eek:
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
Again, be careful. The 'young person' (why can't they just say it's a boy, FFS) involved was allegedly 17 at the material time. He's also stated that his mother's version of events is untrue.

It's all horseshit and the only people that know the truth are the two involved. Personally, I'm staying well clear.
Coward
 

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
Again, be careful. The 'young person' (why can't they just say it's a boy, FFS) involved was allegedly 17 at the material time. He's also stated that his mother's version of events is untrue.

It's all horseshit and the only people that know the truth are the two involved. Personally, I'm staying well clear.
Well that's new, I thought it was a female. Just another rumour then. :nusenuse:
 

Bluelagoona

Not ready for me coffin yet.
Club Sponsor
So once again the online lynch mobs crawl out from under their rocks and spout all sorts of accusations. Strange how the Police see no need for further investigations, maybe they are in possession of something the online trolls baying for blood are not....... THE FACTs !
If the person in question has broken any laws then they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If this person has committed no crime then it is none of our business !
This is purely an exercise in selling newspapers, from a paper that has more than once been sanctioned for telling untruths.
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
The problem is that the BBC has a history of covering up for their own & maybe what Huw did was not illegal but it was foolish at the very least (if he has done what he’s accused of) paying for sexually explicit pictures from a 17 year old may not be illegal but it is immoral & as somebody entrusted with delivering serious news such as Her Majesty the Queen’s death he needs to be beyond reproach.
As for the 17 year old, if he’s blown £35,000 on drugs then let’s hope he fries his brain
 

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
Depends what the contents of said pictures. Loads of free porn on the web so why ask & pay a minor for sexual related pictures. Still sounds feckin dodgy to me.
 

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
So once again the online lynch mobs crawl out from under their rocks and spout all sorts of accusations. Strange how the Police see no need for further investigations, maybe they are in possession of something the online trolls baying for blood are not....... THE FACTs !
If the person in question has broken any laws then they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If this person has committed no crime then it is none of our business !
This is purely an exercise in selling newspapers, from a paper that has more than once been sanctioned for telling untruths.
The police have a decidedly patchy record when it comes to investigating celebrities, politicians and the rich and famous.
And as has recently been shown with the investigations surrounding the "accusations" made by the fantasist Carl Beech and the raid on Cliff Richard's home, they're quite capable of creating a totally unwarranted media shit storm themselves for no good reason.

I certainly wouldn't read too much into the fact that they're doing nothing.
 
Top