T
Tempest
Guest
Been looking to sell my Honda Firestorm which I've spend the past couple of months polishing and tweaking (I must be mad!) with something that's more of an all rounder bike.
I also have a Yamaha TDM850 so trying to replace both bikes with just 1.
Sports/Tourer (for someone 6ft 5" like myself)
ZX12R's and Hayabusa's, whilst exciting, are perhaps not really what I'm after, as I want something I can stick a box on the back and not look stupid with, and also something that's will eat up the miles in a relaxed way.
The Blackbird has been recommended as something that will be the answer to my needs.
Was talking to a guy today who's selling a Blackbird. 16K miles, resonable nick (not perfect) for ?3200 which I feel is a bit steep.
Esp as he's told me it's in need of new chain and sprockets, and also it needs NOW it's 16K service doing (new plugs etc)
I think it's a 99 model (not 100% sure) but it's Fuel Injected (does that mean it must be a certain year?)
He says the fuel injection is fine, smooth ect. no probs.
On the other hand I've also seen another Bird about the same year, but a Carb model, for about the same price and mileage, but with the 16K service all done.
Still feel prices are a tad high (over 3K for a 6/7 year old bike)
Is that right, or am I off the mark here?
But, re my main post title, people with Carb models say they are smoother, faster and generally less problematic than the (poss early) fuel injection models.
Yet, the guy today was saying his fuel injection bike it fine.
So I dunno who's telling the truth.
any advice?
Many thanks
I also have a Yamaha TDM850 so trying to replace both bikes with just 1.
Sports/Tourer (for someone 6ft 5" like myself)
ZX12R's and Hayabusa's, whilst exciting, are perhaps not really what I'm after, as I want something I can stick a box on the back and not look stupid with, and also something that's will eat up the miles in a relaxed way.
The Blackbird has been recommended as something that will be the answer to my needs.
Was talking to a guy today who's selling a Blackbird. 16K miles, resonable nick (not perfect) for ?3200 which I feel is a bit steep.
Esp as he's told me it's in need of new chain and sprockets, and also it needs NOW it's 16K service doing (new plugs etc)
I think it's a 99 model (not 100% sure) but it's Fuel Injected (does that mean it must be a certain year?)
He says the fuel injection is fine, smooth ect. no probs.
On the other hand I've also seen another Bird about the same year, but a Carb model, for about the same price and mileage, but with the 16K service all done.
Still feel prices are a tad high (over 3K for a 6/7 year old bike)
Is that right, or am I off the mark here?
But, re my main post title, people with Carb models say they are smoother, faster and generally less problematic than the (poss early) fuel injection models.
Yet, the guy today was saying his fuel injection bike it fine.
So I dunno who's telling the truth.
any advice?
Many thanks