• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

Bloody MOT!!

ScottyUK

Filtering Through
Read Only
Strange how perceptions differ. When I get an advisory I take it as "this is fine to pass today but you may want to keep an eye on something I've found"

I had an advisory on my CBR600f for the bearing on the bottom of the shock. No problem. At a time convenient to me I bought one and swapped it. I was glad I did as it was rusty with bits missing !!! His advisory meant it passed and hence my daily use of it wasn't interrupted. In fact I thought it was the perfect way to deal with the issue he'd found.
 

Jaws

Corporal CockUp
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
Before becoming a tester myself I have been failed for things that are not even testable even though some can get you nicked under the road traffic act
these are bike specific

EG
Number plate light being out ..... not testable on a bike (it is on a car)

Disc under minimum wear limit ..... a tester has no way of measuring this within the rules

A nail in the rear tyre .... if no cord showing & no cracks present & the tyre has legal tread there is no reason to fail

No front brake light switch...... legal on a bike made before a certain year (no I cant be arsed to look it up at the mo)

Of course common sense says the above needs mentioning or sticking on an advisory but a tester cant legally fail any of the above

Crazy I know but that's the way it is :-0)

The year front brake switch is needed is 1986 Slim.. There were a few exceptions as some bikes still managed to get their SV approval without one being OEM ( lord knows how !! )

Number plate light

True if fitted but has not been a requirement for many years .. Its an odd one this.. It is not even a legal requirement now on any vehicle fitted with reflective plates ( this only applies to the UK as there are many many counties where a 'tag light' IS a legal requirement ) The number plate light is not even mentioned in modern MOT hand books

Even back in the day it fell under 'weird'...

I attended a course back around the early 70's .. I was invited to attend but was really meant for serving police officers.
Some smart alec noted that the station car enrolled as the class Guinea pig had both the plate lights out
When questioned the answer was nowt short of obtuse !
Apparently ( back then ) a lack of number plate light was a 'moving traffic' offence.
Which ( taking the letter of the then law) meant that while an officer might see a plate light out on a stationary vehicle, it was not an offence..
Of course, by that time 90% of vehicles had reflective plates so a police car behind with its headlights on could not determine if the lights were on or off !
It was suggested that it would be a difficult case to prove as a clued up driver/rider COULD say they were working just fine before being stop checked and they must have just that minute failed ! :eek: g0551p
The only recourse then would be for the officer to issue a correction order ( a pain in the bum all round ! ) and allow the vehicle to continue to its intended destination
 

Jaws

Corporal CockUp
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
I knew the year off the top of my head but could not remember the date @tu*
 

Dickiebird

Registered User
Just before I took my bike for its' MOT this year , I noticed the small "pilot " light in the headlight wasn't working . So, I replaced it , and the bike duly passed . This set me thinking "What purpose does that farting little light serve in this day and age ! and what is a "pilot " light , ffs ? :dunno:
 
Top