. I don’t agree with what half of them do but everyone deserves a fair trial.
I agree & that's also what the law states but the reality is very different, its a complete lottery & no such thing as a fair trial exists
. I don’t agree with what half of them do but everyone deserves a fair trial.
I take it you were found guilty then??I agree & that's also what the law states but the reality is very different, its a complete lottery & no such thing as a fair trial exists
Yes, even when it's clear cut that they're stonewall guilty. For a start, other offences may come to light. Aside from that, once the judge has passed verdict, they can take into account previous offences when passing sentence. And it's not as if evidence has never, ever, ever been planted to make an innocent party guilty.Do they? Really? In these days of DNA evidence & cctv footage & mobile phone triangulation, sometimes it is so clear cut that a trial is a waste of time & money.
Sounds good to me.then we might as well go back to mob rule and vigilantes.
We’re going to have to agree to disagree on this one. I have a fair bit of experience with these people and they’re certainly not thick. What you’re describing to me sounds like a stereo-typical ‘very senior person’ who doesn’t consider you worth listening to. That’s why he/she employs a secretary/PA and that’s their job. They’re more interested in how much money he/she’s going to make on their next big case and how big a house/car/yacht it’ll buy them.
Not thick at all, mate. Just ignorant and no common sense.
I take it you were found guilty then??
You must have had a good barrister!!Nope !
You must have had a good barrister!!
Why?The aforementioned scruffy little guy, please do try to keep up
Why?