Nutters?

[ScottyUK]

wonder if he would jump off the Stratosphere for us??

Love the way it went from "oh sh1t, oh sh1t, oh sh1t" to smiling as you felt the system working

 

[ianrobbo1]

Yeah it was a bum clencher, went again the next day, just to make sure!! you know like you do!!

 

[slim63]

Yeah it was a bum clencher, went again the next day, just to make sure!! you know like you do!!

And the system screamed, no more, please no more ?

 

[andyBeaker]

TBH I thought they'd stopped doing them. A few years ago there was a big campaign against them based on enviromental impact (I think?) However a quick google suggests there's 3-400 flights a day! Maybe that's what they meant.

definetely still available - funnily enough I have decided against it after learning of the environmental issues around this activity.

Might have got a paper cut printing the tiskets so probably just as well.

 

[andyBeaker]

Yeah it was a bum clencher, went again the next day, just to make sure!! you know like you do!!

I see you are online but not responding to my post.

Pussy.

 

[ianrobbo1]

I see you are online but not responding to my post.

Pussy.

When you have something to actually say without "willy waving" I may or may not be inclined to answer,

 

[andyBeaker]

When you have something to actually say without "willy waving" I may or may not be inclined to answer,

You started it!!!!!

Let's face it, my Pitts Special experience blows you out if the water...........

 

[ianrobbo1]

You started it!!!!!

Let's face it, my Pitts Special experience blows you out if the water...........

It might, if I gave a damn!!

 

[Centaur]

Might I remind you people with the attention span of my willy that we are supposed to be talking about dangerous riding.

 

[ScottyUK]

...the attention span of my willy...

 

[andyBeaker]

Might I remind you people with the attention span of my willy that we are supposed to be talking about dangerous riding.

Suddenly there are rules on here?

Personally I was talking about Ianrobbo not backing his postings with reasoned argument.

 

[Centaur]

His argument may not be reasoned but it is seasoned. Very salty and peppered with bum clenching moments.

 

[ianrobbo1]

Thanks Bill!!

 

[andyBeaker]

Thanks Bill!! View attachment 42098

I bow to your ability to put forward a well reasoned argument by the use of such fine and intellectual prose.

 

[Centaur]

Thanks Bill!! View attachment 42098

Not quite sure to whom you are referring here, Ian!

 

[andyBeaker]

Not quite sure to whom you are referring here, Ian!

Snow White appears to be pointing at you?

Who else could it possibly be??

Ps "whom"? Not sure about that.

 

[Centaur]

Snow White appears to be pointing at you?

Who else could it possibly be??

Ps "whom"? Not sure about that.

Used "who" first but it didn't feel correct so knowing your beady eye would examine my post I tried "to whom" which I know, although not in everyday use, is definitely grammatically correct. I thought back to Miss Craig, my English Language teacher, and could remember her using "to whom" which raised arguments in class. She thrived on hearing us argue correctness in our broad Ulster accents. RIP Miss Craig, a lady who instilled a love for the English language in me.

 

[Jaws]

Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”' or “'she,” then who.
If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom.
Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence.

 

[ianrobbo1]

Not quite sure to whom you are referring here, Ian!

Well it aint you Bill!!

 

[Centaur]

Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”' or “'she,” then who.
If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom.
Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence.

Thanks, John. In this case neither "he or she" nor "him or her" applies.