• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

Jacko verdict

  • Thread starter R2B2
  • Start date
R

R2B2

Guest
Jacko verdict due about 21.30 - Sky News. :eek:
 

ianrobbo1

good looking AND modest
gonna post a "poll" as to the opinions on guilty or what Rob!! :dunno:
 
S

Stealth Rider

Guest
As a man of the cloth, judge and jury
I find Ian Robbo Guiltyof being a total pisshead.
Chief witness Mr Rolfy Dave has informed me of all the goings on at the birthday bash and hopefully they will all come out in the wash %$fan
 

ianrobbo1

good looking AND modest
as it appens Tina has done the wash, :bow: and it has indeed "come out" :eek:
thanks for asking!! :bow: :m
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
Just watching it on sky news.


Noticed that in profile his sister seems to have the same face/nose profile.

Did they get a "job lot" of nose jobs?


:neenaw:
 
O

OzCrow

Guest
Guilty or not guilty he's still the queerest bastard on the planet. :wank:
 
A

Adam Rickenberg

Guest
Where there's smoke..............!

I think the bastid is blerry guilty........ :shooter:

He got off coz he's famous and VERY loopy.... and the jury didn't want a suicide on their hands....

Besides, he's broke and a has-been........ poor little Jacko! NOT!!!! :bandit:
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
Watching the interview with the jury, and the reason they found him not guilty was because they didn't like the alleged victims mother because she stared at them and snapped her fingers at them :eek:

The trial should have taken place in Saudi, see if he had got off with it there
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
derek kelly said:
The trial should have taken place in Saudi, see if he had got off with it there
If they chop off hands for theft
So when he was found guilty what actually wud have been "got off" ?

:lol:
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
Duck n Dive said:
If they chop off hands for theft
So when he was found guilty what actually wud have been "got off" ?

:lol:


I don't know that he would have been found guilty, but the verdict would not have been reached through sentiment. I actually believe that he is not guilty, yes he has been very naive, but I don't perceive him as a manipulative liar which is what paedophiles are. He regards himself as a Peter Pan type of character which is credible when you consider the childhood he had mixing with adults all the time, being beaten by his father, and manipulated by adults it is no wonder he is not what we would call normal.

BTW I am not a Michael Jackson fan
 
R

R2B2

Guest
I agree with DK. I'm not convinced he's guilty and have pretty much had some doubts from the beginning. Cos you're a bit of an oddball doesn't automatically make a person guilty, which IS what a lot of people think.

When you are an eccentric with wealth and fame you are going to be a target for all sorts of scumbags who want a slice of your pie - and they dont come much worse than the likes of Janet Arvizo (sp?).

What sort of mother would send her son for acting lessons as part of a plot for extortion. She should now be in the dock herself.

I know we can't be 100%, but if he really is innocent there will still be the fingers of guilt pointed for the rest of his days, and if he is innocent then that is one hell of a load to bear. That is the downside of the justice system.

I'm not a big fan either.
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
Did'nt mean to imply I thought he might be guilty.

Personally I thought it was daft bringing the case. Given the history of the main witnesses a good defence was always going to be able to say reasonable doubt.

The other big weakness always had to be how anyone could believe any parent who thought their child was being abused would allow it to continue.
 

Samster

chamon motherf*cker
40 something year old men do not sleep with children. Ever.

40 something year old men do not live in a place like Neverland Ranch and have a normal psyche

Sane adults do not dance on top of SUVs at their arreignment.

He is surrounded by a gang of people whose entire mission in life is to make sure he doesn?t get caught and he pays them well.

He paid off the last accuser.

He doesn?t see what he does is wrong. He thinks he is doing something good for them. Don?t many abusers feel this way?

He has created a lifestyle that is straight out of a paedo's fantasy. An amusement park and fantasyland for children and he is like Willy fookin' Wonka.

If he is not a pedophile, then why don?t his famous friends leave their kids with him?

I look at him and my stomach gets sick. My stomach is a good barometer.

That whole family is like a bad episode of the twilight zone.
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
Samster said:
40 something year old men do not sleep with children. Ever.

40 something year old men do not live in a place like Neverland Ranch and have a normal psyche

Sane adults do not dance on top of SUVs at their arreignment.

He is surrounded by a gang of people whose entire mission in life is to make sure he doesn?t get caught and he pays them well.

He paid off the last accuser.

He doesn?t see what he does is wrong. He thinks he is doing something good for them. Don?t many abusers feel this way?

He has created a lifestyle that is straight out of a paedo's fantasy. An amusement park and fantasyland for children and he is like Willy fookin' Wonka.

If he is not a pedophile, then why don?t his famous friends leave their kids with him?

I look at him and my stomach gets sick. My stomach is a good barometer.

That whole family is like a bad episode of the twilight zone.

Not a fan but I try and keep an open mind. Anyone of his age who behaves the way he does and there's one very clear message getting through - he doesn't act his age.

There can be lots of reasons why that should be - could be what you see. But there are plenty of examples in the world of peeps who have a mental age greatly less than their physical age.

I have personal experience of this and I know it can very very, very confusing and misleading if you don't know the individual personally. Outward appearence and some of their behaviour can appear to be in line with age/apperence and then suddenly they act in a way which is very much at odds and open to the wrong interpretation.

Your list could suggest either what you believe or someone with a lot of problems for other reasons.
 

Wolfie

Is a lunp
Agree with sam :bow: :bow: :bow:


he is an evil feckin bastid, and should of been given the electric shock across his feckin nuts.

but money talks.
 
Top