• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

VAR bias again

andyBeaker

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
derek kelly i assume you don’t think there was a blatant push that the whole world outside of Yorkshire could see for the disallowed goal and that both Fulham goals should have been disallowed for, well, er,…..just disallowed.
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
The Fulham goals should have been disallowed because the Leeds goal area was in a different time zone at the time, they were busy having their tea :)
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
derek kelly i assume you don’t think there was a blatant push that the whole world outside of Yorkshire could see for the disallowed goal and that both Fulham goals should have been disallowed for, well, er,…..just disallowed.
He barely touched him & he over exaggerated his dive, should have been booked for simulation, Gnonto was offside, no complaints there however if I recall at one time if the ball came off the keeper then it was onside.
Fulham should have perhaps had a penalty when Koch wrapped his arms round the striker’s neck.
Both Fulham’s goals were cracking, Tyler Adams to blame for the first one.
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
Ok getting back to Leeds perfectly good disallowed goal, on the replays it is clear that the defender thought he was Tom Daley, instead of over turning the decision var should have invited the dickhead with the whistle to have another look but that would have resulted in a yellow card for the Fulham defender, not what the ref was bribed to do on this occasion
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
Not seen it but I’m told Leeds had a clear cut penalty denied when Rodrigo was brought down.
 
Top