I'd suggest they are better able to do this when alive.
They were in his 'care' at the time, according to all parties.
There's laws about animal cruelty, too.
See my earlier post where I suggested 'procedural error' would come into this debate.
Or allegedly break the law by killing the dogs by neglect? btw- According to Murt's 'rumours' he was off-duty; this doesn't stack up with attending a mmeeting, surely?
I'd suggest that he's risking such a procedure at the moment, unless the OP's suggestion of a cover-up takes place.
"Tragic error"......."nobody could have known"...... Try "nobody knew it was that hot that day". Say it was for the handler's safety, or terrorism related
I'd say it's both, so we half agree.
I'm not anti-police, just anti BAD police. I hope you can appreciate that there is a difference. If you can't see a difference then it would reflect worse on you than on me; if you can, then we might find common ground.
Apart from (eg) V-power & supercharger comments to Karlos?
Personal abuse - the resort of a man running out of debating strategy?
I have a question- why do you and others insist on defending this clown & his ilk?
RH
Rovinghawk,
Im sure I speak for the majority.
You righteous bastard, if you think you can do a better job feel free to sign on the line and take your place. People like you turn my stomach, an armchair critic, and my god we have enough of them.:wank:
Last edited: