• Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )

You'll Hate this Feck me..

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
Wouldn't be the first time they'd knowingly facilitated a pervert with his "hobby".
I spelt it wrong, or rather this feckin stupid phone did. Another chinky piece of vomit.
 

Duck n Dive

Rebel without a clue ...
Club Sponsor
I believe Ryland has started a trend by posting a "it wasn't me" message, others are starting to follow.

What a coincidence the story has just broke ready for the Sunday editions.
 

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
I believe Ryland has started a trend by posting a "it wasn't me" message, others are starting to follow.

What a coincidence the story has just broke ready for the Sunday editions.
It's a process of elimination then.

Last one's it. :sisi1
 

derek kelly

The Deli lama
Club Sponsor
On another site there are insinuations about it being a Welsh news reader, (not someone huw reads Welsh news but a news reader huw is Welsh)
 

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
& the winner is!......
Huw 'are joking' Edwards.
Seems he's got mental health issues:rolleyes:which apparently confused him with sheep & jump onto an adolescent youth.
Must be a Taffy natural progression thing?

At least the Yorkies stick to sheep.
:couch:
 

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
Amazing how he suddenly has "serious mental health problems"....only after he was outed though.

They play it like the joker card on It's A Knockout.
 

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
Amazing how he suddenly has "serious mental health problems"....only after he was outed though.

They play it like the joker card on It's A Knockout.
It's going to be another beeb cover up.
It's so obvious it feckin hurts.
Takes years of torment to become a sexual predator & not because you got depressed for a couple of weeks.
Mental health my arse!

Burn the BBC paedophile ring to the ground.
 

andyBeaker

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
Rather ironic the BBC released their ‘highest pad’ list yesterday…guess who was on it…..

However, let’s wait for facts before drawing and quartering him….


Why did I bother saying that??
 

Squag1

Can't remember....
Club Sponsor
Crap hit the fan with RTE too.
So Director General resigned and is too unwell to attend inquiry
 

Pow-Lo

Make civil the mind, make savage the body.
Club Sponsor
Rather ironic the BBC released their ‘highest pad’ list yesterday…guess who was on it…..

However, let’s wait for facts before drawing and quartering him….


Why did I bother saying that??
Considering the potential legal consequences for spouting off and naming names on social media, it amazes me that you had to say it. Did no one learn after Silly Berk-cow got done? All she did was ask on Twatter why a certain individual was trending.

The legal consequences assume greater significance in this particular case now that Dibble have stated that the subject individual hasn't broken any laws. His reputation is already highly likely ruined so if he decides to employ a particularly good lawyer to go after people who've insinuated or alluded to him being a paedo, then a lot of people could well find themselves in some pretty hot water.
 

andyBeaker

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
Considering the potential legal consequences for spouting off and naming names on social media, it amazes me that you had to say it. Did no one learn after Silly Berk-cow got done? All she did was ask on Twatter why a certain individual was trending.

The legal consequences assume greater significance in this particular case now that Dibble have stated that the subject individual hasn't broken any laws. His reputation is already highly likely ruined so if he decides to employ a particularly good lawyer to go after people who've insinuated or alluded to him being a paedo, then a lot of people could well find themselves in some pretty hot water.
It’s also not gone unnoticed that The Sun have slightly changed the story as they seem To have got themselves in a bit of a mess regarding what they said about Edwards. That’s the same Sun that persuaded Sam Fox to leave school,as a sixteen year old to be their lead page 3 girl.

And I see today that Dele Alli has been forced to break cover over his personal issues as the red toos have got wind and are contacting people in his world to get the story first.

They really are despicable. The ‘lessons learned’ and public remorse over their treatment of Diana is soon forgotten.
 

ogr1

I can still see ya.....
Club Sponsor
Considering the potential legal consequences for spouting off and naming names on social media, it amazes me that you had to say it. Did no one learn after Silly Berk-cow got done? All she did was ask on Twatter why a certain individual was trending.

The legal consequences assume greater significance in this particular case now that Dibble have stated that the subject individual hasn't broken any laws. His reputation is already highly likely ruined so if he decides to employ a particularly good lawyer to go after people who've insinuated or alluded to him being a paedo, then a lot of people could well find themselves in some pretty hot water.
Apparently it's not the first time.
Allegedly there are rumours knocking about that there was three other counts of suspicious activity on the Web.
Rumours I know, but this recent allegation is over three years old when the contacted individual was still a minor.

I still say burn the feckin paedo beeb
to the ground. It's tainted history with past known kiddie fiddlers & pretending that they were not aware at the time & then covered up because of their poxy tv ratings war is totally unacceptable.

I begrudge paying these clunts a license as ALL their programmes are shite.
 

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
I begrudge paying these clunts a license as ALL their programmes are shite.
Don't pay it then.

We stopped paying the twats a couple of years back. We only watch streaming stuff and get the news via news apps.
 

andyBeaker

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
Don't pay it then.

We stopped paying the twats a couple of years back. We only watch streaming stuff and get the news via news apps.
You don’t have a TV?? my understanding is That’s the only way of avoiding the licence fee ??
 

Cougar377

Express elevator to hell
Staff member
Moderator
Club Sponsor
You don’t have a TV?? my understanding is That’s the only way of avoiding the licence fee ??
Wrong. There is nothing illegal about owning a television and not watching live broadcast TV.

The TV in the livingroom is only connected to my PS5, which is connected to the interweb for streaming services.
The TV in the bedroom is also connected to the interweb for streaming.
No satellite dishes or aerials are connected to either TV set and we do not watch live TV.


Taken from www.tvlicensing.co.uk

"Is a TV Licence required to own a television set?

You don’t need a TV Licence to own or possess a television set. However, if you use it to watch or record programmes as they are being shown on TV or live on an online TV service, or to download or watch BBC programmes on demand, including catch up TV, on BBC iPlayer, then you need a TV Licence in order to do so."
 

Pow-Lo

Make civil the mind, make savage the body.
Club Sponsor
Apparently it's not the first time.
Allegedly there are rumours knocking about that there was three other counts of suspicious activity on the Web.
Rumours I know, but this recent allegation is over three years old when the contacted individual was still a minor.

I still say burn the feckin paedo beeb
to the ground. It's tainted history with past known kiddie fiddlers & pretending that they were not aware at the time & then covered up because of their poxy tv ratings war is totally unacceptable.

I begrudge paying these clunts a license as ALL their programmes are shite.
Again, be careful. The 'young person' (why can't they just say it's a boy, FFS) involved was allegedly 17 at the material time. He's also stated that his mother's version of events is untrue.

It's all horseshit and the only people that know the truth are the two involved. Personally, I'm staying well clear.
 
Top