I still don't think electric cars are the future. The cost of the infrastructure alone would put a halt to everyone going electric, and that's if they can overcome the engineering issues of such a massive demand spike when everyone got home (And the drop in demand when everyone leaves there home in the morning, unplugging the car, turning the lights off, etc..)
Then you have the environmental impact of electric cars. Batteries are very resource intensive to produce and use some pretty nasty chemicals in there production, and then you have to add the fact that the components are strip mined and transported around the world by polluting ships before they're assembled into your 'green' car. On top of that the lifespan in only a few years, and I know the technology is getting better but an internal combustion engine (properly maintained) could still be going in 100+ years.
I have always believed that hydrogen is where we should be diverting our attention. It's abundant in the atmosphere, we can also make it, it can be delivered by conventional means as the LPG infrastructure is already in place. Existing engines can be converted quite easily to run on it, meaning were not scrapping the entire fleet of cars already on the road and classics can be converted too. With enough scale in production the natural gas supply to homes could also be converted, and small scale power stations could also be run on it to provide 'peaking' plants that provide additional power into the grid at peak times.
The production of hydrogen requires electricity, but this would be a base load (Not really fluctuating) so would suit nuclear power, with topping up coming form other sustainable sources.
And the best thing about hydrogen.....We already have the technology, proven on a national scale, to change over very quickly. All we need is the motivation for change.
Regards,
Alex
Then you have the environmental impact of electric cars. Batteries are very resource intensive to produce and use some pretty nasty chemicals in there production, and then you have to add the fact that the components are strip mined and transported around the world by polluting ships before they're assembled into your 'green' car. On top of that the lifespan in only a few years, and I know the technology is getting better but an internal combustion engine (properly maintained) could still be going in 100+ years.
I have always believed that hydrogen is where we should be diverting our attention. It's abundant in the atmosphere, we can also make it, it can be delivered by conventional means as the LPG infrastructure is already in place. Existing engines can be converted quite easily to run on it, meaning were not scrapping the entire fleet of cars already on the road and classics can be converted too. With enough scale in production the natural gas supply to homes could also be converted, and small scale power stations could also be run on it to provide 'peaking' plants that provide additional power into the grid at peak times.
The production of hydrogen requires electricity, but this would be a base load (Not really fluctuating) so would suit nuclear power, with topping up coming form other sustainable sources.
And the best thing about hydrogen.....We already have the technology, proven on a national scale, to change over very quickly. All we need is the motivation for change.
Regards,
Alex