Discussion in 'Coffee Shop' started by Squag1, Aug 10, 2019.
I really think people when found guilty of this sort of attack on the po po, and similar should not be considered for any parol, IE, ten years being ten years inside, ETC
I'm sure in the past any attacks on the police was treated as a very serious crime
A police egg, earlier today.
Some labour leftie twat was having a go at BoJo yesterday, saying he was wrong to want to make ten years mean ten years. Her basis was that the prospect of parole was an incentive for good behaviour inside. Um, how about no chance of parole being a better deterrent to stop them committing the f’ing crimes in the first place.
What is it with these liberal fuckwits?
Dead right. The idea that criminals (especially "career" criminals) should be treated as the victim is ludicrous and has been typical of liberal lefty thinking for years.
Start making prison the last place on earth you would want to be and the scum will get the message soon enough. Repeat offenders should have their sentence doubled each time (or introduce the "3 strikes and you're out" rule as per the Yanks.
THen theres the yank way of eg 5-7. 5 if you behave and 7 if you don’t. And so on.
Prisoners tend to be absolute shits until their parole board is coming up.
Bit like people who say what a shame it is when people get record for carry small amount of drugs.
Simple - don't carry a small amount of drugs!!
Only one sure way of preventing reoffending.
I have said it before....
Mandatory jail sentences for carrying knives and production or distribution of drugs.
I will now add attacking any member of emergency services to that list.
None of this nanny pwmbynsuspended sentence/community order stuff.
I agree with most of the above, the problem is the prison service cant cope with the extra population as the jails are rammed as it is, its underfunded, there is no space hence the namby pamby attitude to sentencing
Increase the numbers in cells.
If someone doesn't want to be in a crowded cell there is an easy answer - behave.
It is, after all, supposed to be a punishment.
loss of liberty is the punishment & I agree 5 years should mean 5 years but inhumane treatment such as jamming 5 blokes in a 2 man cell is wrong & only leads to more problems within the system
Rope is cheaper than incarcerating someone for a length of time, it ensures that the offender is not going to reoffend, it protects innocent people from that offender, what’s the problem?
And rope can be re-used. That should please the liberal lefties.
But if 1 guy kills the other 4 then he saves the tax payer money AND enjoys a roomy cell to himself. Result.
Then he gets to be in the CSC where he gets virtually anything he wants otherwise he’ll kick off, at a cost of more than keeping the prisoners he killed
Until they jam another 4 murderers in there & poor Derek has go in to clean up the mess
That works too. Just keep repeating what I mentioned earlier until there's no more prisoners. Then Derek only has to watch one guy.