-
Welcome to the new B.I.R.D. Forum. Please be sure to read the "New Member / New Registered ? Please Read" thread in the Coffee Shop. This contains some important information. To become a full member ( £5.90 a year ) simply click on your user name near the top on the right I hope you enjoy the new site ................ Jaws ( John )
Explanation???
- Thread starter Smix
- Start date
stan the man
you are not capable
Smix said:
there ain't enough letters in the alphabet to make up a big enough word to describe the law smix d34l
A
Aidey
Guest
Yes Rhino, but apparently only from Hereford castle, and with a bow and arrow.
But to get back to the point of Smixs thread, just WTF is going on in this country?
Perhaps uninsured drivers should be treated like those with guns and knives, a guaranteed jail sentence.
But to get back to the point of Smixs thread, just WTF is going on in this country?
Perhaps uninsured drivers should be treated like those with guns and knives, a guaranteed jail sentence.
stan the man
you are not capable
dunno about a bite.........
john..but a "nibble" maybe
RHINO said:
john..but a "nibble" maybe
stan the man
you are not capable
ianrobbo1 said:
maybe not ian....although,it is the coffee shop
and rhino started it :cry:
h1d1ng2
RHINO said:
Anyone for Archery at the bash???
stan the man
you are not capable
did i mention i was coming in my howitzer (no it's not a blue bird derek)
(no it's not a blue bird derek)
stan the man
you are not capable
Wolfie said:
:cry:
B
bitontheside
Guest
Aidey said:
And from within the walls of Chester! True!
T
THETOMSK
Guest
The law was only allowed for archers who practiced at the butts every sunday...cue bert man8um
Tomsk
Tomsk
'fraid it's to do with what the CPS actually decide to charge with.......
if the driver is only charged with driving without due care etc then sentencing is limited to that.
Given the recent conviction by jury, of someone with hooks, using existing laws after the cps failed to prosecute earlier 'cause "not confident of getting a conviction" I'd suggest it may be the CPS's "confidence" that's the problem.
maybe they should trust juries more often. I suppose it's about getting a balance between taking cases to court when the evidence is sketcy and maybe putting folks through the process when there's no chance of convicting??
It does strike me that't there is a subtle worrying side to this CPS business - in essence the CPS actually decides guilt before a case goes to court in that the court don't even get to hear the case if the CPS decide they don't. The recent hookey case shows that they can get that wrong as it would seem the reason for not going to court earlier was proly flawed 'case a jury would convict??
if the driver is only charged with driving without due care etc then sentencing is limited to that.
Given the recent conviction by jury, of someone with hooks, using existing laws after the cps failed to prosecute earlier 'cause "not confident of getting a conviction" I'd suggest it may be the CPS's "confidence" that's the problem.
maybe they should trust juries more often. I suppose it's about getting a balance between taking cases to court when the evidence is sketcy and maybe putting folks through the process when there's no chance of convicting??
It does strike me that't there is a subtle worrying side to this CPS business - in essence the CPS actually decides guilt before a case goes to court in that the court don't even get to hear the case if the CPS decide they don't. The recent hookey case shows that they can get that wrong as it would seem the reason for not going to court earlier was proly flawed 'case a jury would convict??