Worst seat ever; it irks me that with so many bikes these days you need to by the 'comfort seat upgrade' to get something that is comfortable to ride all day. Are modern bikes only intended to pose to the nearest café???
I tested the original multi-strada 1000 when it came out and couldn't wait to give it back, I tested the new 1200 model too in 2011, was given as hour to ride it but was back in the shop after 40 minutes.
To ride? Awesome engine, though I did seem to hit the rev limiter too quickly (guess I'm just too addicted / used to high-revving fours) gearbox was reasonably slick for a V-twin (which are always clunkier than multis), phenomenal brakes; for the height of it, it handles really well but, that seat! I'm not a large person (5'6"] but the front of the pillion seat seemed to sit up against my coccyx and was uncomfortable. It may well be a personal thing, there are a lot of people who like them. Having said that, in my experience, there are a lot of people who'll spend 10K or 15K+ on a bike, tell you how fabulous it is then sell it three moths later ("Oh, It just wasn't me" etc etc).
Comfort, ergonomics, are a very personal thing; These new Dukes are a lot more reliable than old ones, (but still cost a lot more to maintain / service) but aren't up to Jap bike standards. I guess the electronics package might seem attractive, and in the end, it is the most important questions as with any bike: what floats your boat and what traits are you willing to put up with to own it?